×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hello Larry,
thanks for the insight! Well appreciated.
Am 25.11.2019 um 17:50 schrieb DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
You can also see in WRKSYSACT the average CPU speed the cores are running at as a percent of the maximum for the chip. It is VERY often less than 100.
Ah, didn't know that command, not existing in V4R5. :-) Thanks!
don't sacrifice these things just because you feel a micro-watt savings might result!
Please don't get me wrong, I'm all yours when it comes to readability and maintainability (which also includes comments where needed). I wanted to point out that sometimes, a problem can be solved in more than one way and mostly that way chosen is the most comfy one because "we've plenty of cpu cycles, so why bother about a tiny increase in speed".
What I wanted to say was that these microwatt (per what? Energy costs were calculated from power times time) don't matter for one server but it certainly would make a difference when considering all servers around the world.
Virtualization with commodity wintel hardware already saved a *huge* load of power, considering that the alternative would be to have more physical servers running.
:wq! PoC
PGP-Key: DDD3 4ABF 6413 38DE -
https://www.pocnet.net/poc-key.asc
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
