Re: AS/400 vs. IBM i -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: AS/400 vs. IBM i
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:15:28 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Am Freitag, den 01.11.2019, 16:16 +0100 schrieb D*B:

All folks stating that IBM is best in backwards compatibility are
reminded on Y2K!!! Tons of applications had to be fixed.

What has y2k to do with backwards compat? It was more an early-
unawareness/ignorance problem. Of course apps had to be fixed, because
no one anticipated that code will survice all these years.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.