RE: A WRKOUTQ with fewer options

That was my thought as well. I've used it to add a few options/functions but have not tried restricting/changing the IBM supplied options.


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryan Dietz
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 5:44 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: A WRKOUTQ with fewer options

It would be interesting if the spool user-defined UIM options list exit point QIBM_QSP_SPLF_LSTACT could except all options from the WRKOUTQ screen.
You could then get creative as needed to restrict certain options.

Just trying to think around the edge of the box,
Bryan

On Oct 22, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Darren Strong <darren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'd like to give some support people access to WRKOUTQ, but without some of the options in the "Work with All Output Queues" screen. This is the screen displayed if you do a WRKOUTQ and hit enter. These operators do not have command line access. We'd like them to be able to hold and release queues, but not reconfigure them with options like 2=Change, 4=Delete, or 8=Description. I'm trying to avoid recoding all the screen logic in my own program just to remove some of these options. Is there a trick I might use to disallow some of these options but allow others?

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com