Now that is hilarious, the network won't support a SAN graphical interface?
Which by the way, any way you cut it is a requirement since you can't even
create LUNs or Hosts without the ethernet attachment. (graphical or
character based)
I'm thinking jealousy is the root cause.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Justin
Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:40 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Why adulterate ports vs using an additional IP address? Was:
Ports IP specific?
That's the way everything is, and why I keep everything I can within IBMi.
For the SAN, they didn't want to give me the IP address because they said
their network couldn't support my SAN.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:25 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Why adulterate ports vs using an additional IP address? Was:
Ports IP specific?
Basically that came down to my last question: drudgery with the network
people.
Did the Windows people object to the address because they wanted the SAN
only for themselves or are they just that <word for a tight opening normally
reserved for passing waste> on IP addresses?
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
midrange.com
