|
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:11 PM Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:That caught my eye as well, John. But thinking about it some more, while I don't know if this is Coy's case, some companies allow things on their development box - build utilities and test platforms and such - that they don't allow on their production machine.
Seriously? With IBM's declaration that the yum repository is _the_ successor to the OPS product surely that should be enough?Well, there's a bit of subtlety. Coy said *IBM's* repository. Right
now, Mono is in what amounts to a third-party repository.
Of course, Coy also said that he can only do testing with IBM's repo,
not production, and that is kind of a mind-boggler.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
