Re: 1879 vs 1916 disk drive comparison

[Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>]

What's you disk activity look like now?

If 10%...sure go ahead...
If 76% active...I wouldn't

If in the middle....

Charles

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:02 PM Jerry Draper <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> We need to upgrade disk drives in our 8202 SAS machine.
>
> We have:  1879: 283GB 15K RPM SAS SFF Disk Drive (IBM i)
>
> Replacement drives:  1916:  571GB 10K RPM SAS SFF Disk Drive (IBM i)
>
> We will will gain necessary disk space but these are 10k drives vs the
> 1817 at 15k.
>
> What might be the response time for our users?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry
>
>
> --
> Jerry Draper, Trilobyte Software Systems, since 1976
> IBMi, Network, and Connectivity Specialists, LAN/WAN/VPN
> Representing WinTronix, Synapse, HiT, and others .....
> (415) 457-3431 opt-1 . www.trilosoft.com
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
> Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
> questions.
>
> Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
> link: https://amazon.midrange.com