× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Paul,

SANs do not inherently provide better performance than internal disk(SSDs or HDDs). They do provide flexibility and capabilities which are not available with internal disk, as you described with the migration to the v9000. One area that Storwize shines with though is EasyTier. I think this is a much better solution for mixing SSD and HDDs than what we can do internal drives on IBM i. EasyTier along with the ability to Flash Copy a partition are very beneficial.



________________________________
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Musselman, Paul <pmusselman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 11:54:23 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: FC Performance vs SAS

Any disk in the new CPU? Or is everything in the SAN?

You'll never hear about it during the sales pitch, but for some reason, accessing data thru a SAN does have some overhead!

We had a V7000 with everything (including load source) in the SAN. Performance wasn't -bad-, but it didn't have that boost we were looking for. We ended up adding a Texas Memory Systems (as IBM) flash appliance. THEN things were zippy!

Now, the -real- advantage of everything in the SAN was when we migrated to a V9000- no massive save/reload! Business Partner hooked everything together and the data smoothly waltzed onto the new hardware. Nice!

Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Holger Scherer
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2018 10:29 AM
To: Midrange-list <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: FC Performance vs SAS

Hi Friends,
a colleague just called me about an end user having some performance issues:

- old box: Power6 E4A, 32G RAM, 18 Disks 139GB SAS
- new box: Power7+ E1D, 128G RAM, V5000 with 8GBit FC, 24*300G 15k Disk

the new box is slower when running some old style RPG reporting program,
there is not that much I/O and V5000 box gets about 1000 I/O Sek.
If running serial operations (like save into save file) the box can do 14000 I/O
and up to 550MB/Sek.

As we do not have much customers with a small P7 and SAN - does anyone
of you have experience with these types of config?

-h
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.