× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The discussion is interesting, but I think to remember from a long time
ago that the entire OS (CPF38,OS400,I5/OS) is build on spaces of maximum
16MB... the space object is the basic object that stores permanent data
to the DASD... and it is brought in MS by pages of 4K... any other
higher level object (*PGM, *FILE, etc...) holds a directory to one or more
internal spaces...
the *USRSPC object gives very fast access to one space with space
pointers..

IMHO, changing the size of the basic user space would mean to entirely
rewrite the OS...
there could be another way, ... changing the *ÜSRSPC object to an higher
level object that would be a directory to the basic space object... but
the disadvantage would be to slow down significantly the access to *USRSPC
and that would change the performance of many products like (BRMS, Power
HA, MIMIX, etc.. that are intensively using user spaces...)

SQL is certainly an alternative to interface with the OS, but I guess the
SQL function uses the user space API (or the list API when available)
under the cover...

so I'd like to ear IBM reacting on this thread ...

Paul




From: Darren Strong <darren@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/10/2018 15:26
Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: User spaces still limited to
16MB?
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



It appears to me that IBM's strategic direction is to move toward SQL
functions that provide the same functionality to APIs, so I suspect that
userspaces may be considered legacy.




From: "Dan" <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/09/2018 04:58 PM
Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: User spaces still limited to
16MB?Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



I guess I'm baffled why IBM hasn't addressed this 16MB limitation by now.
It seems that plenty of its APIs have plenty of potential to exceed this
limit. And RPG is no longer limited to 16MB with the teraspace
enhancements from how many releases ago? Has no one ever submitted an RFE
for this?

- Dan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.