× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. August 2018

Re: Another FieldProc question

I'll say.  However, at least it didn't update it with the masked value, i.e. masking is one-way.  Of course as Jon Paris pointed out, if you had a program that reads the record, then updates it without excluding that field, then you'd update it with the masked value.  A real landmine.

On 8/31/2018 9:55 AM, Rob Berendt wrote:
ROB sees the whole 234-56-7891, which makes perfect sense, based on the
masking.
What doesn't make sense is that DUMMY1 was allowed to change it. Rather
confused by the conflicting information in that redbook.


Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.