Re: CL parameters over 32 length -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: CL parameters over 32 length
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:26:56 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:20 AM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Whether due to optimization or historical artifact, it's fine
honestly. Let's just call a spade a spade. The current behavior is not
exactly *hard* to work with, but it's definitely not as simple as it
could be, whether we're talking about implementation or use.

Let me quickly add that I'm NOT advocating for changing the current
behavior. I don't think it's worth it.

So the last sentence in my previous message should have read "...not
as simple as it could have been...".

John Y.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.