× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. July 2018

RE: BRMS SAVSYS performance differences

Being burned, severely, by assuming that a performance thing was a
difference between SSD and spinning disk I would get verification.
In my case I took data from here, drove it up to IBM and put it on their
system. They had SSD and (at the time) I had spinning disks. Much better
performance at IBM. Wrote big check and got SSD's. Very little
improvement.
Turns out the improvement was that IBM had us restore into an iASP. This
caused us some difficulty and we turned journalling off. That was the
real difference. Solution: Buy HA journal performance. Huge benefit at
a small fraction of the cost of SSD's.
Not that it's related to your situation but I would get verification from
IBM before assuming it is a SSD vs spinning disk issue.
And I did open a PMR on SAVSYS taking longer and they worked quite closely
with me.
Go for it!


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.