× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thanks Brad,

We will definitely test! And yes, it is policy.....

Adam DRIVER
GTS/MKT/SSB/AS400
440 S. La Salle, 25th Floor
Chicago, IL 60605
Tel.: +1 312.762.1194
Cell: +1 224.250.9049
Team: +1 312.762.1125
Email: adam.driver@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adam.driver@xxxxxxxxxx>

www.sgcib.com<http://www.sgcib.com/>
Primary CI: AS400
Assignment Group: gts-wwi-ssb-app-as400
Team Email: amer-gts-mkt-ssb-as400-team
Tel (24 hrs): 312 762 1125

Any new support request should be sent to the first level at helpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:helpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


[http://insite.fr.world.socgen/ecard/images/logo_legal_l.gif][http://insite.fr.world.socgen/ecard/images/logo_legal_r.gif]


date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:35:17 -0500

from: Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bvstone@xxxxxxxxx>>

subject: Re: Mass update of SMTP name in the Directory Entry



On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:47 PM DRIVER Adam <adam.driver@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adam.driver@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



Thanks Brad.



This doesn't tell us much, there are only a small handful of users

that currently have a SMTP name. However, we will be getting a dump

from another HR system of user email addresses, probably as a

spreadsheet. I'm thinking we may be able to do an SQL update of QATMSMTPA!





I would test that first. I don't know if you need an entry in the other file as well.







Just to clarify what we need, we currently allow just about anyone to

send mails from the IBM i, but we are changing (Corporate policy) to a

different SMTP gateway that will only allow it based on access

approvals from another HR system and a valid Active Directory name.

Aside from changing the server name in CHGSMTPA, we have to set up SMTP names for all current users.





That should be handled at the new gateway vs checking for an active name.

And you only need an active name to send from the IBM i if you're using

*cough* IBM's email system.



But I understand if that is "policy".


*************************************************************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential, intended
solely for the addressee(s), and may contain legally privileged information.
Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible
to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
Please visit http://sgasdisclosure.com for important information regarding
SG Americas Securities, LLC (“SGAS”). Please visit http://swapdisclosure.sgcib.com
for important information regarding swap transactions with SOCIETE GENERALE.
*************************************************************************

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.