× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. April 2018

Re: Memory pool , object question

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Evan Harris <auctionitis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Paul

On your first point, I think if an object is in memory then it is "in
memory" and the object does not need to be paged in again from disk while
it is in use by a job. Probably the second job just gets a pointer to the
existing object in memory (I expect tables will behave differently....).


​Correct, in memory is in memory. But Tables work exactly the same, other
than for larger tables, usually only part of the table is in memory at a
given point.

But any job that needs that part will use it from whatever pool it is in.

Basically the whole point of single level store.​

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.