RE: Perm vs Temp PTF applies

That has the advantage of making the new group/cumulative go marginally
faster since the system will not have to IPL into the "A" side first to
apply things. (Make sure to leave the IPL source "B" regardless of the
status of the PTFs)

I'm not sure I see any additional benefit to the extra steps and IPL cycles,
unless of course you IPL that often anyway.


--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff
Crosby
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 12:33 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Perm vs Temp PTF applies

Once upon a time a bazillion years ago, someone on this list suggested
permanently applying all PTFs just prior to loading a new cume. If I
remember correctly, whoever this was felt that was about the right amount of
time.

That's what I did from that time on.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey, it's your shop, no skin off my teeth.


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03/05/2018 01:13 PM
Subject: RE: Perm vs Temp PTF applies
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



For supersedes yes (that's why I talked about "explicitly" perm applying).


I'm not sure I'm good with the "in for a penny, in for pound" approach.




-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 11:52 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Perm vs Temp PTF applies

But you were already, just not all of them. Let me be the second to
try to explain this to you.
You put on PTF SI12345. It fixes QCMDEXC. You put it on temp.
Next month you put on PTF SI23456. Hark, it fixes QCMDEXC again.
Since it does that it has to put SI12345 on permanently, and then
marks it superceeded. At this time there is no way to RMVPTF SI12345.


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600
Mail
to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD