Re: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation

There's nothing "cup almost empty" about just stating a fact.

I can see how just kicking off multiple separate java instances gets rid of
the class path issue, so i have no problem with your solution, but the JVM
startup for each of those instances is an expensive and unavoidable side
effect.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Richard Schoen <
Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well that would be the cup almost empty way of looking at it.

Don't knock it until you've tried it and actually deployed production
processes with it 😊

Or you can.....

Regards,
Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
------------------------------

message: 3
date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:23:42 +0000
from: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation

So you're starting a separate JVM for every call. Then you can certainly
use whatever Java properties you want. You'll also have to suffer thru the
JVM startup everytime.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD