Re: FTP into Source PF...anyway to control the Sequence#?

[Richard Schoen <Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you thought about storing the source members with all the date and sequence fields in SVN ?

Then when you pump them to the 400 the line numbers would get maintained. 

Regards,


Richard Schoen 
Director of Document Management 
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
p. 952.486.6802 
w. helpsystems.com 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:19:57 -0700
from: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: FTP into Source PF...anyway to control the Sequence#?

Thanks Matt!

That will help.

Charles

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Tyler, Matt <matt.tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> RGZPFM with SRCOPT()
> *SEQNBR
>     The records have a new sequence number placed into the
>     sequence number field.  The SRCSEQ parameter specifies
>     a start value and a value to be added.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Charles Wilt
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 10:45 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: FTP into Source PF...anyway to control the Sequence#?
>
> All,
>
> We FTP source members from an SVN working copy on our PC to a IBM i 
> PF_SRC file.
>
> The problem we've run into is we've got a few huge programs, which end 
> up with a seq# of 9999.00 repeated for hundreds or thousands of lines 
> at the end of the program.
>
> They compile fine, but if we happen to need to debug one of them, 
> using the *LIST debug view...the debugger freaks out.
>
> Failing that....anybody know of an existing command line tool that 
> will re-sequence a source member in place?
>
> Thanks!
> Charles
> --