Re: DSPF Record format ID differences -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I recall such a PTF,in the v5 timeframe, that affected PF/LF with date/time
fields I believe ...

But there's no date/time fields in this display file...

Charles

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 6/1/2017 4:08 PM, Charles Wilt wrote:

Why would a two versions of a display file have different record format

IDs

when the fields appear identical?

I have a vague tickle about a PTF that addressed a problem like this.
Were the two *DSPFs created at different OS levels?

--
--buck

Try wiki.midrange.com!

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.