× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Doable, but a maintenance
nightmare.


​Not really, no.

The idea is that the LFs will never change. And once you build the first
field list, it's a simple matter to copy and past to the other logicals.

If at some point you add a new field that a program needs, then you create
a new logical, with an explicit field list that includes that new field and
change the program to use the new logical.

As long as the​ new logical has the same key as an existing, there's no
extra overhead beyond a few bytes of DASD for the object definition.

The concept's been around a while, programs only access data via logical
file with an explicit and unchanging format.

But the DB2 modernization whitepaper/redbook outlines the technique as a
method to move from DDS

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.