× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. August 2016

Re: Replace command processor

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting
Inc. <mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given that you can write a command processor program, so can anyone else. All someone needs to do is call their own command processor to get around yours. And really neither exit points nor routing entries nor command overrides will be able to change that. If you want to completely prevent any program that could possibly act as a command processor from circumventing your specific command restrictions, then you are going to have to have the source of them all because none of them have to use the exit points or routing entries. You are left with object security, and all that can do is allow or disallow access to an object for a particular user or group of users.


But if you limit capability, and your own command processor doesn't
allow calls, then they can't call their own command processor.

chris@xxxxxxxxx
www.brilligware.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.