|
Hi there,
We have recently attempted establishing a new 3rd party connection using
HTTPAPI. They are a modern enterprise and use TLS unlike our other 3rd
parties others who still use SSL.
The 3rd party provides both a test and production connection but HTTPAPI
fails to connect to the test machine.
Both our dev and prod machines will connect to the 3rd party prod machine
but neither will connect to the test machine.
The error is the wretched -
(GSKit) Peer not recognized or badly formatted message received.
(GSKit) An operation which is not valid for the current SSL session state
was attempted.
It should be noted that we cannot connect directly since all connections
must go via our proxy server, but that has been a very straight forward
matter.
Our V7R1 development and production machines appear to be set up with the
same V7R1 PTFs etc, especially the TR6 one for TLS.
Strangely, we have written a PHP script using CURL and another using a
Node.js script which both successfully connect to the 3rd party test
machine (via the proxy)
I've done an online TLS test using the tester at https://ssldecoder.org
which reports both 3rd party connections as OK , both supporting the same
protocols as follows -
- TLSv1.2 (Supported)
- TLSv1.1 (Supported)
- TLSv1.0 (Supported)
- SSLv3 (Not supported)
- SSLv2 (Not supported)
I've used the QSSLPCL system value to try both *OPSYS and *TLSV1 both this
makes no difference.
At present the developer has opted for the using HTTPAPI to submit the
request to a Node.js server running in a batch subsystem but that's all a
bit too convoluted for my liking.
We have always used HTTPAPIR4 so it's a shame we can't get it to work.
Even though it is the version complied in 2009 it does actually work OK
when connecting to the 3rd party production machine.
I've even tried using the optional protocol parameters for
https_init(AppID:peSSLv2:peSSLv3:peTLSv1) with sslv2 and sslv3 set off an
tlsv1 set on but that makes no difference.
It seems like there is something about the 3rd party test machine that
HTTPAPIR4 does not like.
Cheers, Peter
##############################################################
This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential or legally privileged information, or both. No confidentiality
or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this
correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and
notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this
correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. Any views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of Veda. If you
need assistance, please contact Veda :-
Australia http://www.veda.com.au/contact-us
New Zealand http://www.veda.co.nz/contact-veda
##############################################################
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.