× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Interesting V5R1 post you linked. Later in that thread Neil Palmer
commented:
I guess IBM though I was clear enough. Here's
their reply! It looks like we'll finally get that user
controlled switch (via a data area) soon ! ;-)
... followed by what appears to be a quote from an IBM'er confirming that.
(http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200111/msg02870.html)

I have no idea how to search IBM for information on this, if it actually
happened.

- Dan

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:44 PM, CRPence <crpbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 08-Jul-2016 10:34 -0500, Dan wrote:

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, you may recall that the
panel for Display Open Files in DSPJOB/WRKJOB defaulted to display
the I/O details. Then, at some point, IBM added the scoping details
as an F11 toggle, and made the scoping details the default panel.

Enough people complained, and IBM graciously "blessed" us with a
request-only PTF to make the I/O details panel the default and that
needs to be applied with every new release. Has this changed? Is it
possible that IBM gave us a hidden data area or some other
user-configurable doo-dad to control the default panel for Display
Open Files?

From the archive, the thread starting with:
[http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200011/msg00026.html]


A link to the most recent discussion thread that I could find follows;
that discussion concludes, apparently, that support for an additional PTF
at each release, and perhaps even any alternative support for assigning
which view is presented [as was alluded in the APAR sysrouted across
various releases], was abandoned on\since v5r1:
[http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200111/threads.html#02772]
Subject: PTF for viewing open files (WRKJOB/DSPJOB) for V5R1

Sadly, what was originally offered was a /bad idea/; a poor choice, for
a variety of reasons, but most notably, that any future defects in the code
would require a two-pronged chain of PTFs to enable both versions to
persist. Their rationale in such enablement surely was that in all but one
release, the code had never before been changed via a PTF, and the
expectation that would remain so. I do hope that they did not offer a fix
by that implementation, on any release since; per...

Most unfortunate is that the fix-developers apparently failed to consult
other [experienced fix and OS] developers for a recommended approach to
take; hopefully they would have avoided any proponents of the too commonly
offered data-area-implementations, even if that is not nearly such a poor
choice as contrasted with what was done. So I hope also, that they did not
offer a fix by that implementation, on any release since; per...

The OS has long [always, AFaIK] supported a feature of the Interactive
Profile Entry (IPE) to store last-used values, as effective /preferences/
for a user. The developers IMNSO should have [learned of and] used that
IPE feature in their first iteration of that support. Having done so, that
implementation could have been [the first and] the final /fix/ for allowing
a user-preference to determine which variant of the panel was presented,
based on the last\previous variant that was viewed by that user; there
would have been no need to suggest the possibility that a "customizable
feature may be created in a future release.", because that customized
effect would be directly available to every user simply by using the
F11=Display [alternate] Details, or they could have added something along
the lines of a F23=Save As Default View to set a preferred choice instead
of solely showing the *PRV view.

Of course even with the use of the IPE, care must have been taken not to
improperly implement functionality with that feature; e.g. as existed at
one time in some generic Work With positioning functions:
[http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201407/msg00907.html]

--
Regards, Chuck


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.