× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Rob,

So it's better smaller/but more NWSTG?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Berendt
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 11:26 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Improve R&D LPAR poor disk performance (10K spiiny) by using virtualized SSD from Production LPAR

Go with the 6/nwsd

Do not consider me the expert on this as these recommendations are constantly being updated. Normally Sue Baker, Larry Bolhuis and others have some input on this. But it is summer, ...

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: "Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'"
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06/24/2016 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: Improve R&D LPAR poor disk performance (10K spiiny) by
using virtualized SSD from Production LPAR
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Rob,

I've finished crunching my numbers.
On my Production LPAR, I'm around 45%. 7TB total.
I'm planning on virtualizing 3tb, which will be about 42% of my current
available.
This will put my Production LPAR around 87%.

Should I create 30 NWSTG of 100gb each or 10 NWSTG of 300gb each?

I already have 5 NWSD created.

Each NWSD could/would have either 6 NWSTG or 2 NWSTG, depending on which
config I use.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob
Berendt
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 10:11 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Improve R&D LPAR poor disk performance (10K spiiny) by using
virtualized SSD from Production LPAR

I'll be shortly spinning up a new lpar.
We added a new disk enclosure to one of our Power 8's. The only disks in
that disk enclosure are these:
Serial Resource
Number Type Model Name Capacity Status
Y68008GE813A 59DD 050 DMP053 1729739 Non-configured
Y68008GE3RDA 59DD 050 DMP051 1729739 Non-configured
Y68008GE709A 59DD 050 DMP055 1729739 Non-configured
Y68008GDYXSA 59DD 050 DMP057 1729739 Non-configured
Y68008GE7LHA 59DD 050 DMP059 1729739 Non-configured

1.7TB drives.

I'll add them to the hosting lpar into a new ASP.
Then to use them on the guest I'll do this CRTNWSSTG ... ASP(2)

This new lpar is strictly old archival Domino data. Seems like an ideal
fit for these drives.


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.