×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




7.1
SF99710 16120 Cumulative PTF Package C6120710
SF99710 15317 Cumulative PTF Package C5317710


I'll follow up with the rest later.


Thanks



-----Original Message-----
From: CRPence [mailto:crpbottle@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 7:53 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RDi debug & authority failures

On 03-Jun-2016 13:28 -0500, Justin Taylor wrote:
Recap:
I'm debugging RPG code using RDi. If the job is running under a
different user, I get a large number of authority failures generated
in the security log. Is there any good way to eliminate those AF
entries?

Here's the list of objects:

Object Library
name name
QDBCHKLA QSYS
QDBGETKY QSYS
QDMCOPEN QSYS
QDMCRODP QSYS
QDMGETOV QSYS
QDMROUTE QSYS
QTEVINVR QSYS
QTEVSIRF QSYS
QTQGETCC QSYS
QWCSRTLR QSYS
QWTPECTL QSYS
QWVAGSRV QSYS

Cross-post WDSc & Midrange lists.


What is the IBM i OS release and cumulative level? The actual spooled joblog from the job identified by the T-AF would provide the most specific symptoms and some pertinent context; i.e. symptoms more capable of being searched than only knowing of the T-AF, such as specifically the program to which [i.e. T/pgm_name] the msgMCH1001 was signaled from the LIC Authority Exception notifier [i.e. F/#auexcpt].
What kind of program [ILE or OPM; for the latter, presumably then, compiled with OPMSRC(*YES)] and what kind of debug activity is requested [SEP, STEP INTO, set break-point] when the error occurs? Does /different user/ mean different than the user servicing the job, or that the current user of the serviced job is different than the job-user that was originally used to start the job, or something else? Perhaps just define all of the users of the scenario; the user of the qualified JOB() name being debugged, the current-user of the JOB() being debugged, the user that initiated and is performing the debug, the user identified in the T-AF as having encountered the msg MCH1001 [aka x0A01].

FWiW: similar effects were documented in some very ancient APARs:
APAR SE26773 and APAR SE34653

--
Regards, Chuck



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.