Re: DB2 Multisystem -- holy $%&# -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: DB2 Multisystem -- holy $%&#
From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:03:12 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree - IBM need to hear things from different sources, that helps build a case for something. To me, suggesting a DCR approach is never a slam on COMMON, just an alternate inroad.

Vern

On 2/4/2016 12:16 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I think I'd go with the DCR. Not as a slam to COMMON, but maybe it would
be reviewed by a different team at IBM.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.