× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Greetings, correct the 2.1.1 release is fully supported and has a very
long life ahead.

Tim


Tim Rowe, timmr@xxxxxxxxxx
Business Architect Application Development & Systems Management for IBM i
IBM i Development Lab, Rochester, MN
(507) 253-6191 (Tie) 553-6191

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/are/index.html



----- Original message -----
From: midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: MIDRANGE-L Digest, Vol 14, Issue 1679
Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 12:00 PM

Send MIDRANGE-L mailing list submissions to
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
[1]http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
midrange-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MIDRANGE-L digest..."

*** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove all text
unrelated to your reply and change the subject line so it is meaningful.

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Future of Web Query? (rob@xxxxxxxxx)
2. Perf difference between EJ0L PCIe3 12GB Cache RAID SAS
Adapter vs integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb
x8 (Steinmetz, Paul)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:13:48 -0500
from: rob@xxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: Future of Web Query?

I think your BP is dyslexic. 1.1.2 maybe. I don't think so for 2.1.1.

[2]https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=2fa35040-0f4b-49fe-b91c-b3e027f7fc01&ps=25

Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
[3]http://www.dekko.com

From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "MIDRANGE-L (midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx)" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/01/2015 12:03 PM
Subject: Future of Web Query?
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

We own DB2 Web Query and have active support for 5733WQX v2r1m1. I
installed the licensed program and it asked me for a license. Contacted
our BP about getting the license, and they said IBM is dropping support
in
September. Has anyone heard where IBM's going with this? I don't want
to
start using a product that's going to be dropped in less than a year.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [4]http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [5]http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

------------------------------

message: 2
date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:43:35 +0000
from: "Steinmetz, Paul" <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Perf difference between EJ0L PCIe3 12GB Cache RAID SAS
Adapter vs integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8

Because the P8 S824 CEC DASD must be controlled by the integrated EJ0J
PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8,
I would like to know how much of a performance difference there would be
seen between the EJ0L PCIe3 12GB Cache RAID SAS Adapter vs integrated
EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8?
I'm looking for the best possible performance on an R&D LPAR, with a
mixture of SSD/HDD.
All SSD is out of the question.
System ASP would be all SSD (hot data), 3.1 TB to start, possibly
larger.
ASP2 would be all HDD, (cold data) 25 TB or 36 TB, depending on config
option.
The various BRMS tools would be used to force cold data to ASP2, or HDD.

I have several options for this R&D LPAR, which will also be hosting a
sandbox LPAR and a DSLO LPAR only used to create DSLO images for OS
upgrades.
I've opted not to use the SSD cage, SSD capacity would not be large
enough.

Option 1
Place 18 1.7TB 10K RPM SAS in the CEC, ASP2, (lesser used) controlled by
integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8
Place 6+ 775GB SFF-2 4k SSD in EXP24S, System ASP, controlled by EJ0L
PCIe3 12GB Cache RAID SAS Adapter
This option would result in the best performance with an HDD/SSD
mixture, keeping each drive type on separate controllers per
recommendation, but also with an extra cost factor.

Option 2
Place 18 1.7TB 10K RPM SAS in the CEC, ASP2, (lesser used) controlled by
integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8
Place 6+ 775GB SFF-2 4k SSD in EXP24S, System ASP, also controlled by
integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8
This option would give up performance, still allow HDD/SSD mixture, but
save the cost of 2 EJ0L.

Option3
Place 6+ 775GB SFF-2 4k SSD in the CEC, System ASP, controlled by
integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8
Place 24 1.7TB 10K RPM SAS in an EXP24S, ASP2, (lesser used) also
controlled by integrated EJ0J PCIe3 RAID SAS Adapter Quad-port 6Gb x8
Performance should be the same as option 2, would result in larger HDD,
ASP2, still allow HDD/SSD mixture, but save the cost of 2 EJ0L.

Any thoughts from the group?

Thank You
_____
Paul Steinmetz
IBM i Systems Administrator

Pencor Services, Inc.
462 Delaware Ave
Palmerton Pa 18071

610-826-9117 work
610-826-9188 fax
610-349-0913 cell
610-377-6012 home

psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx<[6]mailto:psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
[7]http://www.pencor.com/

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) digest
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [8]http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [9]http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

------------------------------

End of MIDRANGE-L Digest, Vol 14, Issue 1679
********************************************


References

Visible links
1. http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
2. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=2fa35040-0f4b-49fe-b91c-b3e027f7fc01&ps=25
3. http://www.dekko.com/
4. http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
5. http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l
6. mailto:psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
7. http://www.pencor.com/
8. http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
9. http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.