"Steinmetz, Paul"
<PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:57:16 GMT:


1) If planning to mix SSD/HDD on a P8 S824 R&D LPAR, and using
both the CEC and a EXP24S, with EJ0L PCIe3 12GB Cache RAID
SAS Adapter, are there any pros/cons for placement of the
drives, CEC or EXP24S?

If you think you'll need to grow beyond 26 387GB SSDs or you
want to use 775GB SSDs, you need to place these in EXP24S with
EJ0L and then use the 18 CEC drive bays for HDDs leaving the 8
1.8" bays empty.

While it is supported to mix SSDs and HDDs on the same
controller, I recommend against it due to the potential for SSD
operations to get queued behind HDDs operations which can cause
disk response time anomalies.


2) Is 571 gb 15K the largest 15 drive HDD drive available?


Currently, it is. (Confirmed by looking at HW sales manual at
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?
docURL=/common/ssi/rep_sm/2/897/ENUS8286-
_h02/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en#Header_31 )

Currently on a P7 8205, using 571 10K, and seeing a large
performance hit using 5913 PCIe2 1.8GB Cache RAID SAS Adapter
Tri-port 6Gb. I'm shying away from using the 10k drives. I
know there are larger 1.1 tb 10k drives available.

Or, if my most used data resides on SDD, perhaps the 10k HDD
would be acceptable?


This may be acceptable in your environment. Only performance
testing with your workload can tell you for certain. I know of
no modeling tools to estimate what the results may be.




This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].