× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Vern,

Thanks for the suggestion


John

-----Original Message-----
From: Vernon Hamberg [mailto:vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 6:20 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Java on 7.1 one system fast other system very slow

Hi John

I suggest you run database monitors from Navigator over the jobs in
question, on each system - then do the Visual Explain thing - you'll
be able to see what optimization choices were made, and maybe see a
difference there.

Good luck, and come on back with the results, then we can speak to
this better, I think.

Vern

On 8/17/2015 4:01 PM, John Allen wrote:
We have a CL program that calls a java program to read modify and
write a file in the IFS



Both machines let's call them F and S (Fast and Slow)



They are configured the same (except slight difference in memory and

disk storage see below)

Both running IBM I 7.1

Both at the same PTF levels for both the SS1 and JV1

Both have similar memory

Both have similar System ASP used (10 % vs 23%)

Both have Java Version =

java version "1.6.0"


Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build
pap3260sr16fp1-20140706_01(SR16
FP1))

IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 OS/400 ppc-32
jvmap3260sr16fp1-20140706_01 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)

J9VM - 20140626_204542


JIT - r9_20130920_46510ifx7


GC - GA24_Java6_SR16_20140626_1848_B204542)


JCL - 20140704_01





Note:

Executing JAVA *VERSION

System F response is instant

System S Response is 20 seconds



We are seeing something similar with our CL program

System F= 5-10 seconds

System S=60-80 seconds



The "JAVA *VERSION" execution is so different I don't think it is
anything in our CL or java program.



I keep comparing the 2 and can't find a difference other than the
performance of Java being so vastly different



What could cause a variance of the simple execution of "JAVA
*VERSION"



Any idea or suggestions on where to I can look?



Thanks in advance for any assistance



John














--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.