× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Justin:

You can use the IBM-supplied API named QLIRNMO -- "Rename and/or Move Object" -- to accomplish this. This API does the same thing that the IBM compilers are doing when you specify "REPLACE(*YES)" -- so you can replace program objects this way.

But, beware of trying to use this API for things like *FILEs, especially PFs, LFs, DSPFs, etc., while they are "in use." No can do.

HTH,

Mark S. Waterbury

> On 7/29/2015 8:46 PM, Justin Taylor wrote:
Currently, we update production programs by simply compiling from source into the production library. I'd like to move the object from the test library instead. The trouble is, I need an exclusive lock on the production object to accomplish this. We run a 24/6 shop, and I can't wait until Sunday to promote an update. Our current compile method doesn't suffer from this problem (the current object is moved to QRPLOBJ and users are pointed there). Is there some way to replace the production object without the exclusive lock?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.