× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Interesting - I see now that the last version to have it was 6.1 - I gave the wrong name, too - IGNORE_DERIVED_INDEX is the right one - who know, maybe that'll actually work.

It was to be used only for whether to consider se.ect/omit or DYNSLT LFs by the optimizer. I think these days, there's no good reason to use it.

Thanks for the heads up, man!


On 6/26/2015 1:18 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I do not see IGNORE_DERIVED_INDEXES in QSYS/QAQQINI.
After checking CHGQRYA I checked QUSRSYS/QAQQINI and there is no entry
there either.
Must be some "undocumented" feature as I don't see it at the link below.
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_72/rzajq/qryoptf.htm?lang=en-us

Tried to add it anyway
CPF433BUnable to update query options file.
reason code 3
3 - Parameter IGNORE_DERIVED_INDEXES was not valid.


Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.