× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 6/17/15 4:51 PM, CRPence wrote:
The conspicuous difference is the Character Field CCSID (CCSID)
column of SYSCOLUMNS catalog VIEW. The H=Hexadecimal, xxxCHAR FOR BIT
DATA [and BINARY] columns will have CCSID=65535. Otherwise..

Not something I'd call reliable, given that I can easily set that CCSID for an ordinary alphanumeric field.

From a generic\purely SQL perspective, there is no difference between
BINARY, Hex, and FOR BIT DATA; i.e. the columns are all to be treated as
binary\image data for lack of any associated encoding scheme. Thus what
is manifest to the SQL clients via the SQL catalogs need not
differentiate those three. However the differentiation is available in
the Database Cross Reference (DBXREF) file QADBIFLD in the column for
Internal Type (DBIITP).

Now THAT is VERY useful, given that if the DB is DB2/400, my JDBCR4-related project will already know that, and will be able to query QADBIFLD as needed when gathering meta-data, and if it's not, then presumably the Hex field issue won't be relevant.

--
JHHL


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.