RE: Temporal database feature on IBM i?

I often submit them through both.

Hey, I love COMMON.  They do great work.  That being said, I once had a 
requirement totally reworded to something not even close to what I asked. 
Confusion?  Or part of someone else's desire to get work done on their pet 
requirement, I don't know.  Granted, that was a couple of decades back. 
I'm just not a big fan of middlemen.  Or let's say that some requirements 
committee says that DB2 parity is not quite as high a priority as numerous 
other items and puts your requirement way down on the bottom.  I may agree 
with them but you may not.

I guess the value of COMMON helps if they put your requirement at the top. 
 :-)


Rob Berendt