RE: CLLE *MODULE question

Thanks, that sounds better.

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 2:10 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: CLLE *MODULE question

YES!! If it needs to be used by multiple program, encapsulate in a service program.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Gary Thompson <gthompson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have a *MODULE created from CLLE code which is used to create
several RPGLE program objects.

I'm thinking of compiling that same CLLE code as a *PGM to make it
easy to call from a CL program I am changing for another project.

I could convert this different CL to a CLLE *MODULE and bind it to the
other CLLE *MODULE, but don't want the extra code and steps . . .

Is it a bad idea to have the same code as both a bind-able *MODULE and
callable *PGM ?


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.