|
Hi Jim,--
Could be a misunderstanding from my part - sorry if so - but I've never seen a damaged object due to transactions not being written from the journal cache.
Lost transactions - yes- but damaged objects - no. Do you have a different experience?
Best regards
stefan.tageson@xxxxxxxx
M +46 732 369934
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jim Oberholtzer
Sent: den 30 januari 2015 18:31
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Power HA and Journaling.
OK, Stefan, I'll accept your reason for Journaling Performance. BUT (and a big one) if you leave 20 damaged objects behind and have to recover them from tape because the journaling was not written to disk in the middle of the failure, it does not matter if you're a bank, NSA, DOD,
companyofyourchoice, it's going to be bad. What Larry is trying to point
out is that if you use PowerHA on the IBM i side then letting plain old journaling is the best bet.
Beside, Banks usually go for "continuous availability" not "High Availability" . While there not much difference technically, there is a whole pot of money difference between them.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stefan Tageson
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:24 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Power HA and Journaling.
Yep, correct, that's why I wrote "If you are not a bank".
For many of my customers the world is not black or white - and most of them favour better performance 365 dsays/year over loosing at worst 30 seconds of transactions ( default setting ) in the unlikely event of a system breakdown.
Best regards
stefan.tageson@xxxxxxxx
M +46 732 369934
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
DrFranken
Sent: den 30 januari 2015 14:56
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Power HA and Journaling.
**WARNING** **WARNING** **WARNING**
First let me say that Stefan is correct here on what option 42 does and how it helps performance. No argument whatever..... for THAT!
BUT this thread is about PowerHA and Journaling! So think about what would happen if you had about 160Kb of journal writes cached per arm and your system fails. None of those writes made it to either of the DB or the journals. (oops!) When you come up on the mirrored system you have lost all that data! Thus option 42 would not be your best friend in this environment.
- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
