For your scenario:
Two tables to define the meal..
One table for the meal (header) the protein/non-protein (must be in the proteins master table).
- Tofu is a protein albeit not meat of any sort.
- The non-protein entry in the protein master may be described as desired: maybe as Air or Protein-Free?
One table for the addition dishes for the meal (detail)
- dish type (starch, vegetable, etc.)
- dish ID (ID must be in the corresponding master table)
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Shore
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:01 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Database design issue: seems really bad, yet I'm having trouble coming up with anything better
What a day to forget my lunch
God - I am hungry
I believe the key here is NOT the individual pieces - but the combination of those pieces that is the important piece of information, including no protein (for the vegetarians), no starch (for the ones like me who are dieting) and no vegetables (for kids who just plain hate them) So in THAT respect - I cannot think of any other way of doing this It will be interesting to see what anyone else comes up with
Alan Shore
E-mail : ASHORE@xxxxxxxx
Phone [O] : (631) 200-5019
Phone [C] : (631) 880-8640
'If you're going through hell, keep going.'
Winston Churchill
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James H. H. Lampert
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:36 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Database design issue: seems really bad, yet I'm having trouble coming up with anything better
Consider this scenario:
We have three sets of items. To avoid discussing the real-world situation, I'll use a food analogy, and call them protein, starch, and vegetable.
We have perhaps as many as 300 distinct protein items (to which others may be added in the future), some 60 starch items (to which others may be added in the future), and some 80 vegetable items (once again, to which others may be added in the future). A complete meal includes a protein, an arbitrary number of starches, and an arbitrary number of vegetables.
We always select the protein first. Each protein has its own subset of compatible starches and vegetables, e.g., if the protein is prime rib,
10 oz cut, then the available starches would include Yorkshire pudding, mashed potatoes, and baked potato, and the available vegetables would include creamed spinach and creamed corn, while if the protein is roast turkey, 8 oz, then the starches might be dressing and mashed potatoes, and the vegetables might be creamed corn, Brussels sprouts, and carrots.
Now, the solution that's been presented to me is for the protein file to have a record for every protein, the starch file to have a record for every valid combination of one protein and one starch, and the vegetable file to have a record for every valid combination of one protein and one vegetable.
Something about this seems wrong. Mainly because it would produce so many starch and vegetable records, repeating any given starch or vegetable for every protein with which it's a valid combination.
Yet I'm having trouble coming up with anything better. Any suggestions?
--
JHHL
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
