|
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Buck Calabro wrote:
On 11/5/2014 10:49 AM, Steve Richter wrote:I follow. But the database system must be uniquely identifying changes that
No. The journal is an independent and asynchronous process from the> actual database update.
that is interesting. But there must be some way the database tracks
individual outputs to a table. How else would the journal pick up those
changes as it asynchronously writes entries to the journal?
It's a one-way feed. The database manager sends the database buffers to
the journal component which then does its thing separately from the
database manager.
are sent to the journal system.
What I am asking for is to have the ID number of the queue entries that are
fed to the journal system to both be stored in the journal entry and made
available to the ADDPFTRG trigger exit program. That way the trigger exit
program could retrieve the call stack and write it to a file with a key
that would be found in the journal entry. Assuming that the trigger exit
program runs in the same job as the procedure that performs the file
output.
Or, IBM could just write the procedure name to the journal entry.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.