×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Are the users using STRSQL?
Do they prefer the selection and prompting of WRKQRY?
Have they tried STRQM as an alternative? (If you have STRSQL you have
STRQM.)
Have they tried STRQM but miss the ease of column formatting with WRKQRY?
Do you have RUNQRY buried into any of your code? Do your vendors require
QU1 be installed because they may have that imbedded?
:-) Are you still running V4 or earlier and have QU1 doing document merge
with OV/400?
Is it worth the savings of dropping QU1 and missing all of this?
I liked the column formatting of QU1 over STRQM. However I forced myself
to stick with STRSQL. The benefit of that was that if I ran into
something that was outside the realm of QU1's 'result fields' I didn't
avoid using that function because it wasn't worth the pain of converting.
And, yes, I know the commands to convert a QU1 query into SQL. I've
written an article on this.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
