Re: WRKOBJLCK on a library -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: WRKOBJLCK on a library
From: rick baird <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:38:36 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

never mind, found it.

System value . . . . . : QLIBLCKLVL

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:33 AM, rick baird <rick.baird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hrmmm...

I have always been able to do a WRKOBJLCK on a library and if it's in the
library list of an active user or job, the lock shows up in the locked list.

But on one client's box, this is not true. it's at V5R4. There are
dozens of users and jobs with a library in the list, but the library is not
locked.

is this a system setting?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.