Re: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:23:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 9/16/2014 9:06 AM, Steinmetz, Paul wrote:

If I do a CRTLF and set the unit parameter, instead of the CREATE
INDEX, will this be a valid test.

You can specify "UNIT SSD" when you create an index or table to set the preferred storage unit.

The Unit option also works on alter table & alter index.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Performance of large LF access path builds - SSD vs 10K spinny , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.