RE: qinter routing entry

That would be good too. I assumed a moment ago there was another default
entry.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gqcy
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 2:15 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: qinter routing entry

sorry,
Not _remove_ that 9999 routing entry, but change it to:

9999 QCMD QSYS *ANY


On 9/12/2014 2:05 PM, Gqcy wrote:

in our QINTER subsystem, we have a entry:

seqnbr program library compare val
9999 PGMEVOKE QGPL *ANY


and that program does a RTVUSRPRF of INLPGM and INLPGMLIB and then
does a:

TFRCTL &INLPGM.&INLPGMLIB


program and entries were created back in 1987, I am sure it was just
migrated from s/38....


is this process redundant?
if I would remove the routing entry, would the signon process and job
start process work the same?

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.