Re: Navigator for i vs System i Navigator Historical Perspective -- MIDRANGE-L

I do recall Windows v1 and v2...but I didn't use them...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Discontinued_versions_of_Microsoft_Windows

My first PC, 386sx-16, came with Windows 3.0

Charles

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:36 AM, DrFranken via MIDRANGE-L <
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Some of you may have been around the platform long enough to remember
Twinax terminals. We loaded no software period then. We didn't even have
cut and paste.

Then we got emulator boards of various flavors and had to load some
software to get the 'green screen' up. Optionally there were some bits that
gave us 'shared folders' by essentially using the Twinax as a network.

Then along came windows 3.1 (whatever did happen to Windows 1 and 2 and
3.0? Probably lost with IPV1, IPV2 and IPV3... But I digress) IBM provided
"Client Access for Windows." It didn't support much and it was slow and
some bits were cranky. The hue and cry abut how crappy, slow, and function
free it was, was loud. To a degree it was that. BUt it was new and
incomplete and IBM said so.

And we had a client for OS/2 that was better, a LOT better. Except it came
in the form of a door stop brick of diskettes. (which I still have, still
wrapped, still works.) And then they killed that and soon OS/2 died as
well, coincidence? I think NOT!

The apple version was nice. Not a single error, or function either. Sorry.

Linux? Yeah there's an emulator for that, well some versions anyway. Not
much else.

Itanic users? Too bad your version got removed (for both of you!)

8 Bit to 16 bit to 32 Bit to 64 Bit. Conversions at every step.

Over the years many versions came along some as required to match windows
versions. From 3.1 to 3.11 to 95 to 98 to CE ME NT 2000 XP Vista 7 8 8.1
and what's next? Of course a LOT of new function was added in there at
various points and whether the code got faster or the PCs did (or both.) At
some point along the journey there reached a tipping point. Most of us
(sure some still don't) decided it performed pretty well. It got to the
point where we loved it (again most of us did) and used it all day, every
day. Despite its humble beginnings its 'ours' now. "DON'T MOVE OUR CHEESE!"

However, A few releases back IBM introduced the new web based 'IBM
Navigator for i.' It wasn't called that then and it didn't support much and
it was slow and some bits were cranky. The hue and cry abut how crappy,
slow, and function free it was, was loud. To a degree it was that. BUt it
was new and incomplete and IBM said so.

But there is a difference. This time the direction is clear. This time
there is no Windows vs OS/2 battle vs Apple vs Linux to divide the
developers. This time no Itinium vs XEON vs ARM vs whatever in the
processor space. There is no 32 to 64 to ?? conversion in the works. This
time it's all running where IBM can control it, on IBM i. This time they do
ONE set of development and it runs on IBM i 6 and 7. The only pieces NEEDED
to run on the desktop are in Java (Read Apple, Linux, Windows, ???) and
those are mostly the Emulator. Oh and how about having to update 1000
desktops in your enterprise? Notanymore! PTFs on i and you're done.

The updates are frequent and SIGNIFICANT. Troubleshooting tools are
better. Performance of the latest i 7.1 version is pretty darn good even on
POWER5 servers with less than a full core. Things work and they keep
getting better. It already has happened for some and for many more the
tipping point will be here again soon. We will like it.

--

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.