|
There is an issue with FF.
Even IE runs better.
First of all, record the values you have for
CFGTCP
12. Change TCP/IP domain information
Host name
Domain name
Mine was
Host name GDISYS
Domain name corp.dekko.com
Next, ensure there is a host table entry.
CFGTCP
10. Work with TCP/IP host table entries
10.17.6.129 GDISYS.CORP.DEKKO.COM
If you have multiple entries, like
10.10.252.193 SYS2MIMIX.dekko-1
SYS2MIMIX
SYS2MIMIX.dekko.com
then make sure that the values from "12. Change TCP/IP domain information"
are the FIRST entry in that list.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1012842
Disable IPv6 if you are not using it.
Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
From: Jim Essinger <dilbernator@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/15/2014 12:04 PM
Subject: Navigator for i vrs. System i Navigator
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
My Environment: Power 7 hardware - 720, running 7.1 TR7 - Running the web
browser version in FireFox/Mozilla
I am seeing several articles touting the benefits of Navigator for i
browser based management over the windows based System i Navigator.
I have tried several times to use the browser based version, and I am
seeing VERY long response times.
For example in the work management section: Browser - I click on the
active
jobs. This opens a tab for active jobs. It spins and the elapsed time
shows 15 minutes, but has yet to give me a display of active jobs.
Try the same thing in windows based version and I get almost instant
response list of active jobs.
Same thing with almost all of the work management stuff. Job Queues,
Output Queues, detail in QINTER or another subsystem.
Same thing with sub options of Basic Operations. Long wait times to get
no
response.
Try the same thing in MS Internet Explorer:
I finally get some response, so something is broken with FF. I don't know
about Chrome, but last time I tried to use it I got the same thing as FF.
This seems to me to be a lot less reliable than the windows client, as IBM
can't control when a browser entity breaks functionality. Response time
still not great but might be acceptable. Windows client is better, green
screen is best response.
Any thoughts on how to get better browser response time?
Can we make FF work or must we wait on IBM and/or Mozilla?
With FF I can set an exception for the site security. How can we make
that
fix permanent so any browser will not balk at the connection?
How is the 7.2 version of the same thing? Is it better? I know that
monitoring has been delivered there. That piece has in part, kept me from
going to the browser.
I am not yet sold on the browser as a management tool for i.
Jim Essinger
Western Power Sports
Boise ID 83619
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.