×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 5/12/14 4:16 PM, Mike Cunningham wrote:
Routine audits of the system audit logs looking for an security admin
who gave themselves access to a file they don't need to access
Hmm. By which time said admin would have probably had plenty of time to
get his or her hands into the cookie jar. Sounds "REactive, rather than
PROactive," and not much of an improvement over those same audits
catching the rogue admin actually ACCESSING the data.
Seems to me that a proper implementation would be like the usual drill
of two keys needed to access a safe deposit box: to grant a new user
access to the restricted object, one ought to need BOTH a user WITH
access to the object, and a user able to GRANT access to it, to sign off
on the authority.
Of course, up through V7R1, they would by definition be the same user.
--
JHHL
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
