×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




It really depends on the disk controller, number of drives, drive types and speed, and size of drives.

4 2T SATA drives at 7200RPM will be slow compared to 8 320GB 15K RPM SAS drives. SCSI performance can really slow things down compared to SAS.

Most Archive ASP's I have seen have been of few large slow drives to hold lots of rarely used data. Would not put prod DB's there.

Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of J Franz
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:03 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: performance diff if move 1 of several app data libs to asp 2

We want to balance our asps so asp 1 not so full, but don't want performance degraded.
If moved, user apps will be reading data from both asps. Asp 2 was orig set up years ago for old rarely used data.
 
--Auxiliary storage pools--   Over-       -----  ASP Media  -----
Name      Number   Type       flow Mirror   Size    Avail   %Used
*SYSTEM    00001 *SYSBAS       No   No      1835 G 206283 M  88.7
*NONE      00002 *SYSBAS       No   No    705650 M 222931 M  68.4
 
Inquiring minds want to know...
 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.