× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If you trying to get to the "latest", find and install 5761JV1 options 14 and 15 which are the Java SE 7 32 bit and 64 bit. Then you won't have to do this again when the java people need 7.

download from the entitled software page, put into a imgclg and then install the licensed program.





On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:45 PM, MARK GOLDEN <mark_golden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Mark,

I;ve asked the operations department to have these installed. I'll then change the software to point at the 64-bit machine via the JAVA_HOME environment variable.
If this works I owe you a beer or a meal  if your ever in the UK.

Regards,
Mark.
   

________________________________
From: Mark S Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2014, 20:24
Subject: Re: Upgrading from V5R4 to 7.1. Java Classic to IT4J


Hi, Mark:

On a recently installed copy of IBM i 7.1, with the latest CUMe PTFs
etc. applied, GO LICPGM option 10, paging down, I see this:

  Licensed  Installed
  Program   Release Description
  5761JV1   V6R1M0      J2SE 5.0 32 bit
  5761JV1   V6R1M0      J2SE 5.0 64 bit
  5761JV1   V6R1M0      Java SE 6 32 bit
  5761JV1   V6R1M0      Java SE 6 64 bit
  5761JV1   V6R1M0      J2SE 1.4 64 bit

Pressing F11 for the alternate view, I see:

5761JV1    8 J2SE 5.0 32 bit
5761JV1    9       J2SE 5.0 64 bit
5761JV1    11      Java SE 6 32 bit
5761JV1    12      Java SE 6 64 bit
5761JV1    13      J2SE 1.4 64 bit

A google search for "ibm i 7.1 how to specify which jvm to use" gave
this as the first result:

    http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1011867

This page describes setting the JAVA_HOME environment variable, with
links to various pages in the InfoCenter for details.

Hope that helps,

Mark S. Waterbury

On 2/20/2014 2:57 PM, MARK GOLDEN wrote:
Hi Mark,

Believe me, I'm not trying to get it to work with the 32-bit JVM, I though it was the only option I had.
If I can still point the software at the 64-Bit JVM GREAT!! I will sleep better tonight.

I will look it up and point the software back at the 64-Bit machine. I'll let you know how it go's.

Regards,
Mark.



________________________________
   From: Mark S Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2014, 19:35
Subject: Re: Upgrading from V5R4 to 7.1. Java Classic to IT4J
 

Mark:

Even with IT4J, IBM still supports both a 64-bit JVM and a 32-bit JVM
...  if this application was all "working fine" with the "classic"
64-bit JVM, why are you are trying to make it work in a 32-bit JVM?

Mark S. Waterbury

On 2/20/2014 2:01 PM, MARK GOLDEN wrote:
Hi Evan,

If you think it could be a JVM issue who would it get reported to. The JAVA code being used is Apache and IT4J is IBM.

Regards,
Mark.


________________________________
     From: Evan Harris<auctionitis@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2014, 18:51
Subject: Re: Upgrading from V5R4 to 7.1. Java Classic to IT4J
   

I'm with Luis on this - it looks more like a JVM issue.

I don't see how recompiling will help other than to provide one more reason
for the java guys to look at it.


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:46 AM, MARK GOLDEN<mark_golden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

Hi Luis,

I am going to take all source from the V5R4 machine and recompile on the
7.1 machine. Would that possibly solve the problem?
I am not a JAVA programmer.

Regards,
Mark.



________________________________
      From: Luis Rodriguez<luisro58@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2014, 18:33
Subject: Re: Upgrading from V5R4 to 7.1. Java Classic to IT4J


Mark,

IIRC, Is it possible that your old program(s) need the 64-bit version of
Java and right now (under the new release) they are pointing to the "new"
32-bit version?

Regards,
Luis

Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert -- eServer i5 iSeries
--



On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:42 PM, MARK GOLDEN <mark_golden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Is there a good document on upgrading from V5R4 to 7.1 where RPG calls
JAVA programs?

I have programs created at V5R4 being installed on a 7.1. Most work
perfectly but there are a few issues
such as '"java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException' happening.

Do the programs need to be recompiled directly on the 7.1 machine?
Do I need to recompile all programs with teraspace enabled?

The setup has been changed to point at the new 'IBM Technology for Java'
JVM rather than the Classic JVM.

Any help greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Mark.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
athttp://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
athttp://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
athttp://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.