× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The main thing is, you don't want a table scan anywhere, if possible. Anything else, bring some details here, maybe someone of us can help interpret things.

On 10/24/2013 12:16 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
I'm going to do that, but I find that it's difficult to interpret (for me
obviously). I can tell if an index is needed - it tells me. But other than
that, it's tough for me to figure out what it's telling me.


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

Have you run your queries through Visual Explain? I find it to be
essential to do this when doing this kind of work.

For the ones with parameter markers or host variables, you can put in
actual values in the Navigator tool.

Vern

On 10/24/2013 11:59 AM, Michael Ryan wrote:
Note: Cross posted because it's SQL in RPG, but I think it's just an SQL
issue.

A continuation of an email that I sent a couple of days ago, and got some
good feedback. I'm returning a result set to RPG or PHP via a stored
procedure.

On further analysis, I need to provide a starting point for record
access.
I was using static SQL and a Between clause for each of 10 fields between
*LOVAL and *HIVAL. Takes too long to run...like 60 seconds over an 800K
record file.

I created individual indexes (EVI's) over each of the 10 possible
columns.
Tried static SQL with a technique like this: Where :xxvnda1 in (' ',
IMVNDA) And.... Still too slow.

Tried dynamic SQL by creating the statement using equal, like this:
SQLStmt = SQLStmt + cBlank + 'IMVNDA =' + cBlank + cQuote + xxvnda1 +
cQuote; Much faster when looking for an equal, but doesn't return records
that don't match exactly.

Tried dynamic SQL using Like, and it's as slow as the initial static
technique.

I'm going to try dynamic SQL using a Between clause, but not as far as
*LOVAL and *HIVAL, and only including the columns I want to search in the
Where clause. I'm not anticipating good results though.

Question (finally): What's the best technique for an SQL-based search
where
I return a result set from a search of multiple fields?

Thanks for any ideas.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.