Re: How to handle Big Data under IBM i? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: How to handle Big Data under IBM i?
From: CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:02:26 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 06 Sep 2013 08:05, Steinmetz, Paul wrote:

The other key item is the number of access paths over the PF.
If you have say 30, that's 31 IO for every 1 insert.
We see poor perf on PF with many access paths, even with the SSD.

TWiMC: Either of the Delayed maintenance and Rebuild maintenance are useful for bulk loads; for non-unique AccPth. e.g.:

CHGLF MAINT(*DLY)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.