Sql statement vs Sql View performance -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Sql statement vs Sql View performance
From: Gary Thompson <gthompson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:15:28 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have an SQL statement I use to list current customers requiring
an EDI 856 ASN for delivery.

I created a view to make this "list" readily available.

An Sql statement (select * from asnview) against the view runs slower
than the Sql statement the view is based on; requiring about 20x time
using Sys i Nav Run SQL Scripts stats ?

(time diff not noticeable in runsql)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Sql statement vs Sql View performance , Nathan Andelin
RE: Sql statement vs Sql View performance , Needles,Stephen J

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.