× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



As was said in your previous posts and by others. Again, my full statement said the same - there are other issues. What you quoted isn't all that was said - are you a newspaper man?

On 6/21/2013 7:31 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
So a site can say they are ready for 6.1, and they are also ready for
7.1, so far as object conversion goes.
</snip>
There's the rub. "so far as object conversion goes". Object conversion
is a part of it. A HUGE part of it. However there are other parts which
may be significant for your installation.
- SQL differences.
- java version support.
etc
None of these are insurmountable. And if you've gotten past the object
conversion then addressing these should be small potatoes. That being
said, they still need to be addressed.


Rob Berendt
-- IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 06/21/2013 08:24 AM Subject: Re: 6.1 and 7.1 Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx John If programs have been converted for 6.1, they will generally run on 7.1 with no issues. As others have said, there can be other issues - but object conversion is not one of these problems. So a site can say they are ready for 6.1, and they are also ready for 7.1, so far as object conversion goes. HTH Vern On 6/20/2013 10:45 PM, John McKee wrote:
>My boss initially felt one vendor would not work at 7.1, since 6.1 was
>all that he saw on their website. He is following up on this. From
>what I have read in the 7.1 and 6.1 MTUs, I don't see issues.
>
>Maybe ill-informed questions, but I am unsure how to research this:
>
>
>1) We have a pc running CA over hospital network as console. I read
>that the connection would have to be revalidated. I am unclear as to
>what that means.
>
>2) Image catalog appears to be only created on the LS. Thus LS has to
>have sufficient space for all DVD images. I thought that was
>interesting.
>
>
>John McKee
>
>On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Pete Massiello - ML
><pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>How about versions of domino unsupported, AnyNet supported at 6.1 but
not at 7.1, Different versions of Java supported for 6.1 & 7.1 with
removal of option 10 at 7.1, Websphere 6.0 not supported at 7.1, but
supported at 6.1. Operations Direct Console supported at 6.1 & not at
7.1, should I continue?
>>
>>Depending on which hardware you have, if it is old it could support
6.1, but not 7.1.
>>
>>I would highly recommend going to 7.1 in every upgrade, but there are
reasons to upgrade just to 6.1 if any of the above will cause you an
issue. This is why we have Memo to Users and the Upgrade roadmap. There
is more of a difference between 6.1 & 7.1 than just the DVD labels.
>>
>> Pete
>>
>>--
>>Pete Massiello
>>iTech Solutions
>>http://www.itechsol.com
>>http://www.iInTheCloud.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John McKee
>>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:06 PM
>>To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
>>Subject: 6.1 and 7.1
>>
>>Object conversion at 6.1. What could possibly be a hurdle at 7.1? I
didn't want to hijack the thread where an upgrade from a v level is being
discussed.
>>
>>John McKee
>>--
>>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
>>visit:http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>>or email:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives athttp://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>>
>>--
>>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
>>To post a message email:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>>visit:http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>>or email:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>>athttp://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>>
-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.