|
Generally when you go this way you slip in a new copy of the LIC and IBM
also directs to install a a refreshed base O/S so that it has at least
the minimum level of PTFs in order to work with the updated LIC. After
this you'll do PTFs to bring both up to current.
- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com
On 6/13/2013 10:01 PM, Charles Wilt wrote:
Ok I found IBM documentation for SLIP install of the LIC...though
Also found some for SLIP install of the OS...
Do I need to worry about the OS?
Charles
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jim Oberholtzer <
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While I have been successful getting PTFs installed, Roberto is right
about the I_BASE, it might be best to plan on a slip install.
To avoid that, apply TR3 first, then TR5 and then TR6. There are PTFs in
those that expand the space needed to store PTFs. Better to slip
install the LIC in the end.
You might also consider permanently applying the current PTFs first too.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 6/13/2013 6:17 AM, Roberto José Etcheverry Romero wrote:
Charles,
I tried to get a TR0 7.1 machine up to TR6 with IBM supplied acum dvd
images. Fails miserably with "not enough space on lic disk" (even
justthey are 146gb disks and attempting to reserve more for lic code doesntTHEN
work).
Only solution? Get an update I_BASE dvd and do a slip of the new LIC.
install the acum and ptf groups. It will shave a lot of time from the
installation.
Best Regards
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Jim Oberholtzer<
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure I'm in the "Don't worry about the 'Not Installed'"
category, since that usually means PTFs are missing. Ordinarily
islikere-applying the cumulative will fix that but it's not something I
working asto leave for very long. You will never know if everything is
it should without all of the PTFs installed. Installing a new LPP
Alsodon'tone way to get that condition, but there are other ways too, and I
forlike the untidiness of leaving them uninstalled.
Larry's correct about read the cover letter for TR6, there is a PTF
the double IPL's but to be safe I'd plan on watching this one.
install.it's going to take Larry's "some minutes" (meaning lots) to
butbehind onPlan and extra couple of hours.
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 6/12/2013 11:00 PM, DrFranken wrote:
> Charles,
>
> You WERE Joking that the system is 3 years and 5 TRs
PTFs and
> you think you're going to avoid a double IPL?????
>
> Of course it's going to work, this IS IBM i after all
PTFs...you will
you maybe
> doing at least two IPLs here. Read the cover letter for TR6 as
times. (I> need a special PTF to avoid having to manually IPL multiple
indicates> can't recall when that dude came out.)
>
> Don't worry about the "Not Installed" as that simply
CUME wasthat new
> LPPs (Licensed Program Products) have been installed since that
> installed on this machine.
>
> - Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
>
> www.frankeni.com
> www.iDevCloud.com
> www.iInTheCloud.com
>
> On 6/12/2013 10:48 PM, Charles Wilt wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I've been asked to get a 7.1 system up to date on
listthought I'd>> >
>> > Since I've been away from the admin side for a while, I
able thesee if
>> > anybody was aware of any gotchas
>> >
>> > Here's what WRKPTFGRP shows
>> > PTF Group Level Status
>> > SF99710 10096 Not installed
>> > SF99710 10229 Not installed
>> > SF99709 7 Installed
>> > SF99709 21 Installed
>> > SF99708 2 Installed
>> > SF99708 3 Installed
>> > SF99707 1 Installed
>> > SF99701 2 Installed
>> > SF99701 4 Installed
>> > SF99637 1 Not installed
>> > SF99627 1 Not installed
>> > SF99617 2 Not installed
>> > SF99572 2 Not installed
>> > SF99572 4 Not installed
>> > SF99369 2 Installed
>> > SF99369 4 Installed
>> > SF99368 2 Not installed
>> > SF99368 3 Not installed
>> > SF99367 2 Installed
>> > SF99366 1 Installed
>> > SF99366 2 Installed
>> > SF99362 3 Installed
>> > SF99362 5 Installed
>> > SF99145 1 Installed
>> >
>> > Now SF99707 is the TR, so I think I should be able to
show notlatest TR
>> > without a double IPL correct?
>> >
>> > I'm a little confused that the cumes (10096& 10229)
applying theinstalled as
>> > DSPPTF 5770ss1 shows:
>> > TC10229 Temporarily applied
>> > TC10096 Permanently applied
>> >
>> > Does anybody see or know of any reason why getting and
--latest
--> -->> > cume, TR, and other groups might not work?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Charles
>> >
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
--To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.