Re: CHGUSRPRF no longer fixes NetServer access

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

  Ahhh... OK.

  Arghh... I guess the only good excuse that remains for me to continue 
doing nothing, is to avoid associating my /name/ with the request.  I 
suppose someone will tell me next that the COMMON requests can be made 
anonymously :-)

  No matter.  In this case, I really do not care enough to do anything. 
 Per my being "not a customer", the poor implementation of their 
current corrective action [that nullifies use of CHGUSRPRF] will have no 
noticeable impact on my life.  IOW, I am too lazy to act, beyond 
offering my opinion on this list, because I would not [in the 
foreseeable future] benefit from any change; nor would I be impacted by 
the current revision.  If Rob or anyone else thinks they would benefit 
from IBM implementing my idea, they are certainly welcome to carry that 
idea forward as their own DCR.

Regards, Chuck

On 04 Jun 2013 12:13, Dan Kimmel wrote:
> The COMMON requirements system is open to anyone; no need to be a
> COMMON member.
>
> CRPence Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:31 PM
>
> > I am not a customer, nor am I a member of COMMON. <<SNIP>>
> > ... not include any remnants of my name\moniker on their submission
> > to avoid any bias by the evaluators.